Cape Wind's latest hurdle a breeze?

October 15, 2007 - by David Ehrlich, Cleantech Group

Opponents of the Cape Wind project may get a small but fleeting victory this week, as the Cape Cod commission is expected to block a permit for the undersea cable needed to connect the wind farm to an onshore substation.

"I don't think it's going to have any substantive impact. We're going to move forward in the permitting of the project," Mark Rodgers, spokesman for Cape Wind Associates, told the Cleantech Group.

The proposed 130 turbine project, to be built off the coast of Massachusetts covering about 25 square miles, is expected to be commissioned in 2011.

It has attracted a small, but powerful, stable of opponents, including U.S. Sen. Ted Kennedy, who has a house on Cape Cod.

Some opponents are worried about the wind farm ruining their view. Cape Wind Associates said from the closest beach on Cape Cod, in clear conditions, the wind turbines will appear one half-inch above the horizon.

Take a look at a simulated view from the mainland here >>

This latest hurdle looks to be just a small bump in the road for the company that's been developing the offshore wind farm for the past six years.

The Cape Cod Commission's jurisdiction covers the submerged electric cables within three miles of the shoreline. It released a draft opinion denying the permit, and plans to put the decision to a vote on Thursday. But that vote won't necessarily give them the last word.

"According to Massachusetts law, the Massachusetts Energy Facility Siting Board has final authority on this matter," said Rodgers.

"They approved these cables in 2005, they conducted a 39 month, quasi-judicial, adjudicatory hearing process on everything having to do with these cables, and determined that the cables and the project would provide substantial benefits to Massachusetts."

Energy Management, which formed Cape Wind Associates, has already spent $30 million on the proposed wind project.

Energy Management has been around for almost 30 years, building and operating six different natural gas plants in the 80s and 90s. The company sold those facilities in 1999 and 2000, and is using some of that cash to fund Cape Wind.

"We're putting at risk, admittedly, some of the capital from past business success in natural gas to try and bring utility scale clean energy to Massachusetts," said Rodgers.

Energy Management is working with Lehman Brothers to pull in financing for the building phase.

"It would be a combination of debt and equity, as is common for traditional power projects," said Rodgers. "As we get farther along in the conclusion of the permitting of this project, I think we'll also be able to get farther along in the project finance side."

The 468 megawatt wind farm is expected to cost in excess of $1 billion.

Rodgers said the company plans to appeal the commission's decision if it decides to block the permit, but the real milestone will be federal approval, which is expected to come in mid-2008.

The issue of the permit for the undersea cable is likely to be resolved "in parallel" with the remaining work on the federal side, said Rodgers.

The state approved the project in March.

An offshore wind project in New York never got as far as Cape Wind, getting killed in August after the chairman of the Long Island Power Authority called the plan too expensive (see Offshore wind gets pricey).

The power authority, which would've footed the bill for the wind farm, released an independent report on the 140 MW project which estimated costs of over $800 million, including the price tag for the transmission cable to bring the power to shore.

First proposed in 2003, original estimates for the Long Island wind farm were between $150 million and $200 million.

In the case of Cape Wind, the Cape Cod Commission cited a lack of information in its draft denial of the undersea cable. Cape Wind Associates filed its application with the Commission in November 2001.

"Obviously we'd prefer that they decide to approve it. Is it going to have any material effect in the end on whether or not the project is built, or when it is built? I don't think it will, no."

Coverage brought to you by


Pillsbury Law Alt Assets Eureka Hedge

Comments

Cape Wind Hurdle more of a Harrassment

The latest possible action to denial of underwater permits for the Cape Wind project seems more of a harrassment than a hurdle. It is a political problem because it was formerly approved two years ago.

The situation is similar to the Super Ferry in Hawaii which would take passengers with their cars between the islands by boat. The state of Hawaii passed a waiver for the Environmental Impact Statement with a 120 day period open for any objection several years ago. There was none. Then when the Super Ferry attempted to travel between islands September 2007, surfers on surf boards attempted to block the boat in the Kauai harbor and some objectors even let the air out of the tires of cars that were brought over. Over 26,000 had signed up to use the system but a Judge (Cardoza) on Maui ruled against it saying that it was illegal to run during the time of the once again required Environmental Impact Study. Now the state of Hawaii stands to lose tens of millions and the Super Ferry company has laid off 300 workers and may be forced to close down completely.

If Hawaii loses this transport system, residents and tourists remain at the mercy of the airlines. It would seem logical to have a boat system between islands (my dad worked on an inter-island freighter back in the 1930's) but for the actions of a few dozen protesters and a judge, we may have nothing in the future. Governor Lingle is attempting at this time to convene an extra session of the state legislature to pass a law that would over-rule Judge Cardoza. What a mess!

The situation with the attempted rejection of the underwater cable seems also to be of this nature. By pushing this issue, opponents of Cape Off Shore Wind Farm seem to be saying that they want their own way, no matter the consequences. This is an attitude just as selfish as those who want to prevent interisland transportation by boat for the Hawaiian Islands.

adrianakau@aol.com

If RFK and other big money

If RFK and other big money people don't like it I feel sorry for them and would rather put it in the next best location. I'd love seeing that in my backyard.

My solar panel are beautiful and I look at them everyday along with my credit on each monthly statement. I know I;m helping the world and saving money.

One man's windfarm...

... is another man's eyesore.

I applaud wind power in principle, but I wouldn't want to have to contend with the image and sound of one in my backyard, either. Nor do I personally like to see the world's landscape increasingly blighted with solar arrays, though, again, in principle, they're better than burning hydrocarbons.

Here's hoping wind, anyway, is relatively short lived in favor of less visually obtrusive renewables like in-stream marine power or sub-surface tidal power.

Ted Kennedy

Ted Kennedy is a hypocrite. He is a prime example of corruption and the privileged class protecting their own backyards. Cape Wind will supply 75% of the Cape's energy, yikes! Even the most jaded Kennedy supporter would surely start to see his mind set. Please do not vote for Ted Kennedy in the future. If you do, you vote for corruption.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Become a cleantech industry insider - click to follow cleantech