French nuclear waste being stored in the U.S.?

December 5, 2007 - by Dallas Kachan, Cleantech Group

Is the U.S., in fact, storing a large amount of nuclear waste produced by France's nuclear reactors?

That was the suggestion in a keynote today at the ThinkEquity ThinkGreen conference in San Francisco by Dr. Yogi Goswami, former President of the International Solar Energy Society, and prolific author and University of Florida professor.

"One small bit of information that most people don’t know, even in our Department of Energy: a large majority of the nuclear waste from France is actually shipped to the U.S.," Goswami said.

"It’s stored in South Carolina. That’s because when initially the French started building nuclear reactors, the U.S. was suspicious of the French, and said ‘hey, you don’t need to keep that nuclear waste over there, we’ll store it for you.’"

"So there’s a contractual relationship that all of that waste comes to the U.S. and is stored in the Savannah River Laboratory, which is the U.S. Department of Energy lab for nuclear waste," he said.

Goswami was speaking on the necessity of reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, given that "at 2 percent growth per year, all known nuclear fuel resources will be exhausted in 2030-2037."

A Department of Energy spokesperson denied Goswami's claim, calling it inaccurate and misleading.

"There [are] no shipments of nuclear waste from France coming to the Savannah River National Laboratory or the Savannah River Site in South Carolina," wrote public affairs officer James Giusti to the Cleantech Group. [ed.: which would come as no surprise, if you believe Goswami.]

While some nuclear proponents maintain the world actually has 2,500 years worth of nuclear material, Goswami says the assertion is flawed, true only "if we are willing to distill the whole sea. Because seawater contains uranium at the level of three parts per billion. But I doubt anybody will be making the economic decision to process uranium from seawater."

The only solution for keeping nuclear plants in commission is to reprocess spent fuel, Goswami said, in order to extend the nuclear power industry's lifespan. But reprocessing is illegal today in the U.S.

"And the U.S. does not allow any other countries that is suspects will make nuclear weapons out of it to reprocess that uranium," noted Goswami.

The academic acknowledged he was accustomed to speaking mostly at scientific and research gatherings.

"This is the first time I'm speaking with people with a financial background," he told a group of several hundred investors.

Coverage brought to you by

EIN News Altairnano CEC Climate Change Business Journal

Cleantech developments making news in the past 24 hours

Comments

nuclear waste

The US still has no way to store it's own waste. Popular Science did an article earlier this year showing how many of the nuclear plants have come to the limit of their on site temporary storage and have huge problems.

http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/691f6912e3022110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html

One short sighted solution is a new reactor that tries to use some of this waste. The only problem is it makes even higher radiation waste , just not as much. It much more weapons grade material so the risk is much higher.

We sure don't need any more short signed solution. Only renewables can clean the air, not use water and as sustainable while getting lower cost the more we use them. I should know I run my entire home on solar and even help the power company with net-metered clean safe energy.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Become a cleantech industry insider - click to follow cleantech