Submitted on September 29th, 2008 by Unregistered user (not verified)
use all have good argument but both sources have their ups and downs.
- to have our homes run through nuclear energy would be expensive buy know anyway because of government tax and all that shit
- and the "super source" would be very much the same way.
but yes we wouldn't have global warming that how you are right
"I've had quite a few people [investors, advisors and entrepreneurs] contact me to say what a good article they thought you had written on the MaRS contingent and on Alternative Fuels."
Michael Hepworth, vice president of business development for Ontario-based Alternative Fuels (Full story »)
Global premier sponsors include
Lead sponsors/partners include
All sponsors | All partners
no ones right no ones wrong
Submitted on September 29th, 2008 by Unregistered user (not verified)use all have good argument but both sources have their ups and downs.
- to have our homes run through nuclear energy would be expensive buy know anyway because of government tax and all that shit
- and the "super source" would be very much the same way.
but yes we wouldn't have global warming that how you are right