Submitted on September 29th, 2008 by Unregistered user (not verified)
use all have good argument but both sources have their ups and downs.
- to have our homes run through nuclear energy would be expensive buy know anyway because of government tax and all that shit
- and the "super source" would be very much the same way.
but yes we wouldn't have global warming that how you are right
no ones right no ones wrong
Submitted on September 29th, 2008 by Unregistered user (not verified)use all have good argument but both sources have their ups and downs.
- to have our homes run through nuclear energy would be expensive buy know anyway because of government tax and all that shit
- and the "super source" would be very much the same way.
but yes we wouldn't have global warming that how you are right