Submitted on February 22nd, 2008 by EricJ (not verified)
Previous info on this process suggest about 50% of the energy in the Aluminum is released as heat, 50% is H2. The fuel cell is about 50% efficient in converting H2 to power, and the reprocessing to create aluminum again is also about 50% efficient - this is the original energy source. All up power to power efficiency is therefore 12.5% - while a Li-Ion battery is about 90%. The battery may be more expensive (though all the reprocessing infrastructure will not be cheap) but batteries need no materials handling is required and a factor of 7 on efficiency is pretty persuasive.
A Microsoft spokesman said the company actually has more ...
Poll
"Cleantech Group has the best written, most informative articles on cleantech. I've upgraded my subscription and have been telling others about it. Keep up the great work!"
Leif Langensand, The Angels' Forum, SF-area angel investor group
Life Cycle Analysis
Submitted on February 22nd, 2008 by EricJ (not verified)Previous info on this process suggest about 50% of the energy in the Aluminum is released as heat, 50% is H2. The fuel cell is about 50% efficient in converting H2 to power, and the reprocessing to create aluminum again is also about 50% efficient - this is the original energy source. All up power to power efficiency is therefore 12.5% - while a Li-Ion battery is about 90%. The battery may be more expensive (though all the reprocessing infrastructure will not be cheap) but batteries need no materials handling is required and a factor of 7 on efficiency is pretty persuasive.