Submitted on June 26th, 2009 by Geoff (not verified)
There are very few people on the planet I would less like to debate about a subject such as this one than Peter Schwartz. I have known him for years, and he is a genius polymath with deep energy industry experience. As for hair-splitting about what Peak Oil really stands for, to most of us who have studied it (which includes Peter) it involves the Hubbert/Campbell/Deffeyes notions of declining production once we pass roughly 50% of the original oil in place (I'm simplifying this, of course.) There are important differences between this geology-driven view of a peak and a geopolitically-driven (or capital-constrained) peak in global oil output. Among other things, the former is permanent; the latter might not be.
A Microsoft spokesman said the company actually has more ...
Poll
"Your [webinar] was informative, with an eye to the special issues that affect cleantech, such
as regulation and the international policy issues around climate change. Looking
forward to seeing more!"
His Quals vs. ?
Submitted on June 26th, 2009 by Geoff (not verified)There are very few people on the planet I would less like to debate about a subject such as this one than Peter Schwartz. I have known him for years, and he is a genius polymath with deep energy industry experience. As for hair-splitting about what Peak Oil really stands for, to most of us who have studied it (which includes Peter) it involves the Hubbert/Campbell/Deffeyes notions of declining production once we pass roughly 50% of the original oil in place (I'm simplifying this, of course.) There are important differences between this geology-driven view of a peak and a geopolitically-driven (or capital-constrained) peak in global oil output. Among other things, the former is permanent; the latter might not be.