- Services
- Solutions
- Cleantech Forum events
- Jobs
- About us
The U.S. government today announced grants of up to $385 million USD to help six American cellulosic ethanol companies "help revolutionize the industry," a spokesperson said.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Samuel W. Bodman today held a press conference announcing that DOE will invest up to $385 million for six biorefinery projects over the next four years.
The money has technically not yet been appropriated, we should note. And while Congress set an authorization level in the 2005 Energy Policy Act, it has yet to actually appropriate the funds. But the DOE is seemingly planning on receiving virtually all of the money.
Officials said today’s announcement is part of the administration’s pledge to support commercialization of breakthroughs in biofuels, announced earlier this year in the State of the Union address by U.S. President Bush. See the Cleantech Group's Bush beckons for biofuel.
"This shows a commitment by this president to invest in the energy sector. As the world's economies continue to grow, there's a continuing demanding for crude oil. It's important to add diversity in our fuel mix," said Craig Stevens, press secretary for the Department of Energy, to the Cleantech Group.
Combined with the industry cost share, more than $1.2 billion is to be invested in these six biorefineries. Discussions between the selected companies and DOE will begin immediately to determine final project plans and funding levels. Funding will begin this fiscal year and run through FY 2010.
The following six projects were selected:
When fully operational, the six are expected to produce more than 130 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol per year.
Critics of ethanol (see Ethanol a boondoggle, says Milken) complain the industry receives unfair subsidies. Today's grants underscore the U.S. government's support of the industry. DOE press secretary Stevens defended the grants to the Cleantech Group.
"We think this is the quickest, most efficient, reasonable, practical way to reduce our reliance on crude oil. We know the technology is there. If we can make this cost competitive with corn ethanol, it'll loosen the grip of oil producing nations. In addition, it gives a further source of possibility of hope to American farmers. It's an American-grown product."
Some say cellulosic ethanol should be viewed as a transitional fuel. All-electric vehicles, say some automakers and industry-watchers, are the future (see Why hydrogen cars will fail.)
When asked if it made sense to spend so much money on pricey cellulosic infrastructure, especially if cellulosic ethanol remains expensive and electric vehicles are the end-game, Stevens said the industry should watch for coming announcements.
"There is an investment in battery technology. There's an investment in hybrid technology. But in terms of ethanol as a transitional fuel, it's important to keep investment strong."
Mitch Mandich, CEO of cellulosic grant recipient Range Fuels, which recently announced a plant in Georgia (see Range Fuels to produce 1B gallons of cellulosic ethanol) told the Cleantech Group the additional money will help his company scale its production quicker.
"Our technology is modular in nature, so we can just add more modules to the Georgian plant. Commercial-level production is at least 10M gallons of ethanol yearly. We'll start around that level at our plant in Georgia, but will be submitting for a permit next week to scale that plant to as much as a hundred million gallons a year over time."
Mandich thinks Range Fuels' cellulosic product, at least, will be competitive with corn-based ethanol pricing on a per gallon basis.
"We know our capital cost will be higher, but we believe our operating costs will be lower. And they're going to do nothing but improve over time."
Services
Solutions
Cleantech Forum events
Jobs
Comments
Not one for subsidies
Submitted on March 2nd, 2007 by InterestedReaderI'm not normally one for subsidies, but think cellulosic deserves a kickstart from governments, like other sources of energy have received in the past.
It won't do a huge amount to solve climate change. But at least it'll help on the oil independence front and free up more crops for food.
Post new comment