- Services
- Solutions
- Cleantech Forum events
- Jobs
- About us
By contracting with an outside vendor to get solar energy from space, Pacific Gas & Electric Corporation (PG&E) (NYSE: PCG) believes it can get renewable solar-based electricity to ratepayers without going into NASA's business.
PG&E revealed today that it has requested approval from the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to enter into a power purchase agreement with Solaren Corp. in Southern California. Solaren would deploy a solar array into space to beam an average of 850 gigawatt hours (“GWh”) for the first year of the term, and 1,700 GWh per year over the remaining term, according to a filing to the PUC.
Under the agreement, Solaren, a startup, would design, build and launch the solar array into space, operate the satellite and deliver the electricity to PG&E's grid.
"There is no risk to PG&E ratepayers for this," said Jonathan Marshall, a spokesman for the San Francisco-based utility.
PG&E filed the application for approval of the power purchase agreement with the PUC Friday April 10. "This was the first one from space," said Christopher Chow, a PUC spokesman.
Solaren is based in Manhattan Beach, Calif., and is seeking investors for a private stock placement to raise "billions" of dollars for its business plan, said Gary Spirnak, CEO of Solaren to Cleantech Group.
Solaren is in talks with investment trusts in Europe and the United States, with which it hopes to finalize investment agreements by the summer, said Spirnak.
Next would come engineering and design of the solar plant that would orbit in space, catch the sun's rays and send them down to a ground station on Earth, he continued.
Solaren says it has a few million dollars in startup funding, but no paying customers, and its web site consists of one page with an animated company logo. However, Spirnak and other Solaren employees have backgrounds from the aerospace business and have been in talks with companies such as Lockheed-Martin and Boeing to build the solar plant and the four rockets needed to send it into orbit.
Spirnak's bio says he was a spacecraft project engineer in the U.S. Air Force and worked at Boeing Satellite Systems. The core team at Solaren appears to have 20 to 45 years of experience in aerospace.
A clear advantage of solar in space is efficiency. From space, solar energy is converted into radio frequency waves, which are then beamed to Earth. The conversion rate of the RF waves to electricity is in the area of 90 percent, he said, citing U.S. government research efforts. The conversion rate for a typical earthbound nuclear or coal-fired plant, meanwhile, is in the area of 33 percent.
"Coal and nuclear plants are just a fancy way of boiling water," Spirnak said, also pointing to the water use inefficiency of current technologies.
Space solar arrays are also 8-10 times more efficient than terrestrial solar arrays, added PG&E's Marshall: "Obviously the sun isn't unavailable at night."
Solar arrays on earth are also affected by cloud cover as well as other impurities in the atmosphere that diminish the amount of sunlight that reaches the panels.
"What makes this unusual is that power from space solar should be available around the clock and year-round," Marshall said.
While Solaren would provide 200MW of electricity to PG&E, according to the filing with the PUC, Solaren anticipates generating a total 1,000MW from its satellite, said Spirnak.
If solar power from space seems to have a science fiction ring to it, it's because it does.
The concept was first proposed in 1941 by science fiction author Isaac Asimov in his book "Reason," about a space station that collects solar energy and beams it to Earth.
"The dots to which our energy beams are directed ... are cold and hard and human beings like myself live upon their surfaces - many billions of them ... Our beams feed these worlds energy drawn from ... the Sun," he wrote, theorizing microwaves for transmission.
The closest comparison to the deployment Solaren envisions is DirecTV, the satellite TV provider, Spirnak explained. DirecTV sends TV signals down to earth on solar-powered RF waves. However, when they reach the earth, the solar energy is wasted, he said, and all receivers pick up is the TV programming. Also, the DirectTV signals are beamed across the whole country to all its subscribers, while with the Solaren service for PG&E, the signal would be tightly focused, aimed at a receiving station in Fresno, Calif.
PG&E also points to recent research that shows the viability of solar from space.
Solar from space research was done by the U.S. Department of Energy and NASA in the 1970s, PG&E noted on its blog today, with renewed interest in it shown during the administration of President Bill Clinton.
The Pentagon's National Security Space office gave solar from space-based solar power (SBSP) high marks in a 2007 report: "There is enormous potential for energy security, economic development, improved environmental stewardship ... and overall national security for those nations who construct and possess a SBSP [space based solar power.]"
Having a large public utility such as PG&E interested in buying energy from Solaren's technology also helps interest investors, said Spirnak.
"Investors always want to know, 'How do you know people are going to buy the power from you?'"

Services
Solutions
Cleantech Forum events
Jobs
Comments
Microwave Power Transmission Satellite-PP
Submitted on June 2nd, 2009 by grey eminence (not verified)Patent Pending using 200 mile LEO orbit and
high energy electrons in Ionisphere, >100% eff.
Solaren will be at 28,000 mile GEO, making any
energy sent useless, photon to micro <20% eff.
Bad Idea
Submitted on June 15th, 2009 by Michael (not verified)Talk about doublethink! They want us to believe that burning fossil fuels is causing global warming so we switch to solar, wind, geothermal, etc. People’s perception of capturing solar energy for electricity production is squeaky clean. So how could solar panels in space be any different? Well I’ll tell you.
Solar energy is being diverted to the earth that would normally pass it by.
This idea certainly would cause man made global warming since the earth would be receiving more solar energy than it would naturally. It doesn’t matter that it’s being converted to radio waves for transmission. Energy is energy. It cannot be created or destroyed. Once that extra energy is here on earth, it’s up to the earth to rid itself of it. There’s no debating that this idea would cause man made global warming.
There are already sufficient amounts of solar energy hitting the earth’s surface that we can harness. What we need to work on is better energy storage. There exists today upper and lower reservoirs where water is pumped up when demand is low, and allowed to flow down to produce electricity when the demand is high.
We need smaller residential type systems so that the stored energy is close to the consumer, reducing the need for transmission lines over long distances. I don’t like the idea of conventional batteries because you have to dispose of them when they die. A system of electrolyzing water, storage and fuel cell would be more desirable.
I really hope this idea gets shut down before any large amounts of money are wasted on it.
It's about time!
Submitted on June 17th, 2009 by L5 Rick (not verified)Space based solar power is the only rational source of base load, sustainable power generation for the 21st century and beyond.
Fusion is a pipe dream that's been 20 years away for the past 40 years.
Ground base solar is only available, on average, 12 hours a day, so you have to install twice the capacity you need so you can store half of it.
Wind power is extremely ugly and only available when the wind blows hard enough. Have you noticed that the rich environmentalists don't want their ocean view spoiled be wind turbines?
The eco-freaks will never sit still for nuclear power.
Coal has a bad name and is a resource that will eventually run out.
Oil is too valuable as a chemical feedstock to burn.
Hydropower modifies the environment too much and kills migrating fish.
Making biofuels from food crops is an incredibly stupid idea. Burning food is even worse than eating your seed corn.
Do the math Michael. Find the area of a sphere with a radius of 27000 miles. Then find the area of the surface of the earth. You'll find that the sunlight being intercepted is tiny.
Learn how CO2 forcing supposedly works. You'll find that your arguement is spurious even if the IPCC is correct.
Space based solar power can supply every kilowatt of energy we need to power our homes and industry. It can supply enough energy that we create liquid fuels to power our aircraft, and our cars and our trains and our ships.
We must move power generation and resource mining off the earth in to space.
Our great grandchildren will either be members of a solar system spanning civilization with indefinite life spans or poor hunter-gatherer nomads living short, brutish lives.
Some part of the energy
Submitted on July 15th, 2009 by Unregistered user (not verified)Some part of the energy directed to the Earth is subtracted by the solar satellites and it is in the same way easy to put cheap orbital shield.
More: other than a global cheap, clean, billions-years-lasting direc conversion solar/electricity resourse You have a shield system enabling the mankid to control the amount of solar energy incoming or simpler a climate controll device.
Space Balls Power Company
Submitted on August 23rd, 2009 by Jim Bullis, Miastrada Company (not verified)If they talked to anyone at Lockheed-Martin or Boeing who had ever had anything to do with satellites, and those with such experience did anything but fall off their chairs laughing, I would be very surprised.
If there was a serious listener, and that is the level of expertise we depend on for military space programs, we have a serious defense problem.
Post new comment